
Watch people who do a lot with few devices. Then pick a way of working, not a device.
Pick a person below and watch one video to the end. Note one thing you want to steal.
Very different people doing the same thing: building music in real time instead of playing it back. Pick whoever grabs you.



TribalNeed plays a whole evening with a simple loop station, a synth and a pile of acoustic instruments. If you want to know how far you get with little gear, watch this.
IN THE BOOKLET: CH 17 · OLD VERSION
For a long time looping was seen as something guitarists do with their feet. Floor units, footswitches, one pedal per function. The devices were built, advertised and sold for guitar.
Dub FX took a guitar device and applied it to his voice. The Boss RC-50 lay on the pavement in front of him for years, operated with his feet, while he made drums, bass and harmonies into a microphone. The device was not meant for that. No spec sheet and no advert ever mentioned that you could layer beatbox with it.
That single act of misuse set off more than any product development before it. Out of it came a whole beatbox looping scene, out of the scene came competitions, out of the competitions came a device finally built for hands and voices, and out of its limits came, in the end, the software. It began with someone in the street using a tool wrongly.


What matters about that: for a long time the competitions prescribed one particular device . Everyone competed on the same machine. That produced an art form of its own, because nobody could get ahead through better equipment, only through ideas and craft.


It is easy to underestimate what came of this. The loop station battles at Swissbeatbox and at the beatbox championships, in Japan among other places, are disciplines of their own today with an audience of their own. Individual rounds have view counts in the tens of millions. For many people this is the first place they ever saw anything like it.
In these battles everyone competes on the same machine , usually an RC-505. Nobody can get ahead through equipment. It is purely about what someone gets out of a device whose limits everybody knows. That is exactly what this course is about too: not more devices, but more out of what you have.
Watching is worth it, especially if you do not loop yet. In five minutes you understand what is possible with five tracks. A good place to start is the semi-final RYTHMIND versus SO-SO from the Grand Beatbox Battle 2019, by now watched well over fourteen million times.
The part usually missing when someone tells this story: it did not run in one direction. Roland had front-rank beatboxers test the device before it was finished. People who stood on stages with it and competed with it said what was missing, what got in the way and what does not work under pressure.
That is why a lot on the RC-505 sits where a hand finds it in the dark, and not where it looks logical in a manual. The device was shaped by people who had to use it while two thousand people watched.
Conversely the device shaped the scene. Five tracks is a specification, not a law of nature. A competition piece that has to fit into five tracks sounds different from one without that limit. A whole generation of loop sets grew in the shape this one machine laid down.
The very people who had helped develop the device eventually stopped being satisfied with it. Not because it was bad, but because a metal box has four limits that cannot be moved:
Metal boxes are not quite that fixed any more: some devices gain entirely new functions through new firmware, more on that in chapter 27. And the limits have a good side: in a box, as a rule, everything works.
The left column sounds like a shortage but is the reason many people stay with hardware. In a box everything generally works, and every knob does something meaningful. There is no setting that has no effect, no menu that leads nowhere, and nothing that has to be set up first. You switch the device on and it is exactly as you left it.
In software, by contrast, you have to think a little like someone who builds things. What happens when this button is pressed? What should it do the second time? Where should it sit? That is more effort before the first note, and more that can go wrong.
In return it is more rewarding in the end, because the result really is your instrument and not a manufacturer's. Both are legitimate decisions. It only helps to make them deliberately rather than sliding into one.
By the way: „without a computer“ is strictly speaking wrong for hardware. There is one inside every one of these boxes. The difference is that it is built in and has exactly one job.
Anyone who reaches these limits has two options: buy and cable up more boxes, or move the whole thing into software, where the surface can be built yourself. The second route leads straight to chapter 21 and to an iPad.
Because it works in both directions. Your setup helps decide what you play. If it forces a shape on you that you never wanted, that is not on you, it is on the setup.
IN THE BOOKLET: CH 15 · OLD VERSION
These are not textbooks for the course but two recommendations from me, because both changed something for me.


The book is not another theory book. It is an attempt to show how small a share the notes have in the whole. Wooten describes ten elements that together make music. The notes are one of them.
In normal teaching almost only the first one comes up. The other nine appear at best as a side note, although they decide whether something sounds good. Articulation is how a note begins and ends. Feel is whether it sits minimally ahead of or behind the beat. Space is what you leave out. Listening is the ability to perceive something other than yourself while playing.
If you play the same melody twice and get two completely different results, you have just experienced nine other elements at work. The book gives them names.
For a course where people improvise in real time instead of reading from a page, this is the foundation. If you build live you have no time to think about notes, and need the other nine all the more. The book fundamentally changed my understanding of music, away from technique and towards something bigger. In the scene I move in it gets recommended by everyone anyway.
He has written a second book. I find the first one better.
Not a music book but one about creative work in general. It is about blocks, about the inner critic, and about getting back to your own creativity. It helped me produce more freely and get in my own way less.
IN THE BOOKLET: CH 24 · OLD VERSION
Start at the top. English comes first, because there is considerably more going on there. If you prefer learning in German, jump straight to the German block.
Then take three things and leave the rest: the SINEE course, an afternoon at the Synthesizer Museum, and a single channel whose music you like. Everything else will find you on its own, as soon as you know what you are looking for.
Several tags per line is normal. Someone who plays and explains while doing it carries both.
My channel is called @graycontrast. It is mostly recordings from the street and from Berlin. Two things on it relate directly to this course.
This block is deliberately at the back. The sources here are not better than the ones above, they are in German. If English is no obstacle for you, skip it. The exception is Alexander Spree, who is up with the musicians because that is where he belongs.
These channels have been quiet for years. What they explain is still right, fundamentals do not go out of date.
In German there is no active channel on live looping for voice or electronics, no current material on iPad music, and nothing freely available from adult-education or music schools. I found none of it, and I did look. If you do know of something: send it over, it belongs in the next edition.
Both are in English, both are free, and both are better written than most textbooks.
And if you ever find something yourself that is missing here: send it to me. The next edition of this booklet will then be better than this one.
IN THE BOOKLET: CH 25 · OLD VERSION